what is the bible remedy to get rid of evil force invadinf my house

Homo emotion

Lust is a psychological forcefulness producing intense desire for something, or circumstance while already having a significant amount of the desired object. Lust can accept any form such equally the lust for sexuality (encounter libido), money, or power. It can take such mundane forms as the lust for food (run across gluttony) as distinct from the need for food or animalism for redolence, when 1 is lusting for a detail smell that brings back memories. It is similar to but distinguished from passion, in that passion propels individuals to achieve benevolent goals whilst animalism does not.

In organized religion [edit]

Religions tend to draw a stardom between passion and lust by farther categorizing animalism every bit an immoral desire and passion as morally accepted.

Lust is defined as immoral because its object or action of affection is improperly ordered according to natural police force and/or the ambition for the item object (eg sexual desire) is governing the person's intellect and volition rather than the intellect and will governing the appetite for that object.

Whereas passion, regardless of its strength, is maintained to be something God-given and moral, because the purpose, actions and intentions backside it are chivalrous and ordered toward cosmos, while also beingness governed by the person's intellect and will. A primary school of thought on this is Thomism, which speaks on the intellect, volition and appetite, and draws from principles defined by Aristotle. However, the exact definitions assigned to what is morally definite and ordered toward cosmos depend on the religion. For example, differences between religions based in pantheism and theism will differ what is moral according to the nature of the "God" acknowledged or worshipped.

Abrahamic religions [edit]

Judaism [edit]

In Judaism, all evil inclinations and lusts of the flesh are characterized by Yetzer hara (Hebrew, יצר הרע, the evil inclination). Yetzer hara is not a demonic force; rather, information technology is man's misuse of the things which the physical body needs to survive, and is often contrasted with yetzer hatov (Hebrew, יצר הטוב, the positive desire).

Yetzer HaRa is often identified with Satan and the angel of expiry,[1] and there is sometimes a trend to requite a personality and separate action to the yetzer. For the yetzer, like Satan, misleads man in this globe, and testifies against him in the world to come. The yetzer is, however, clearly distinguished from Satan, and on other occasions is fabricated exactly parallel to sin. The Torah is considered the great antidote against this force. Though, like all things which God has made, the yetzer hara (evil inclination) can be manipulated into doing good: for without it, man would never marry, beget a kid, build a house, or occupy himself in a merchandise.

Christianity [edit]

New Testament [edit]

In many translations of the New Testament, the give-and-take "lust" translates the Koine Greek word ἐπιθυμέω (epithūméō),[2] particularly in Matthew five:27-28:

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old fourth dimension, M shalt not commit adultery: Merely I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a adult female to lust (ἐπιθυμέω) later her hath committed adultery with her already in his middle.

In English language-speaking countries, the term "animalism" is often associated with sexual desire, probably because of this poetry. Even so, just every bit the English language give-and-take was originally a full general term for 'want', the Greek word ἐπιθυμέω was as well a full general term for desire. The LSJ lexicon suggests "fix one's heart upon a thing, long for, covet, desire" as glosses for ἐπιθυμέω, which is used in verses that clearly take nothing to do with sexual desire. In the Septuagint, ἐπιθυμέω is the word used in the commandment to non covet:

You lot shall not covet your neighbour'southward wife; you shall non covet your neighbor's house or his field or his male person slave or his female slave or his ox or his draft animate being or whatever brute of his or whatever belongs to your neighbour.

Exodus twenty:17, New English Translation of the Septuagint

While appetent your neighbour's married woman may involve sexual desire, information technology's unlikely that coveting a neighbour's business firm or field is sexual in nature. And in most New Attestation uses, the same Greek word, ἐπιθυμέω, does non have a articulate sexual connotation. For example, from the American Standard Version the same word is used outside of any sexual connotation:

  1. Matthew xiii:17: For verily I say unto yous, that many prophets and righteous men desired to encounter the things which ye run across, and saw them not; and to hear the things which ye hear, and heard them not.
  2. Luke 22:xv-16: And he said unto them, With want I have desired to eat this passover with you before I endure: for I say unto you, I shall not eat it, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God.
  3. Acts 20:33: I coveted no man's argent, or gold, or wearing apparel. Ye yourselves know that these hands ministered unto my necessities, and to them that were with me.
  4. Luke xv:14-16: And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that country; and he began to be in desire. And he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. And he would fain have filled his abdomen with the husks that the swine did swallow: and no man gave unto him.
Catholicism [edit]

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, a Christian's heart is lustful when "venereal satisfaction is sought for either outside wedlock or, at whatsoever rate, in a manner which is contrary to the laws that govern marital intercourse".[3] Pope John Paul 2 said that lust devalues the eternal allure of male and female, reducing personal riches of the opposite sexual activity to an object for gratification of sexuality.[4]

Lust is considered by Catholicism to be a disordered desire for sexual pleasance, where sexual pleasure is "sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes".[5] In Catholicism, sexual desire in itself is good, and is considered role of God's plan for humanity. However, when sexual desire is separated from God'due south dear, it becomes disordered and self-seeking. This is seen as lust.

St. Thomas Aquinas differentiates between sexual intercourse within marriage, which is seen as meritorious through giving justice to i's spouse, and sins of lust which can themselves be differentiated in magnitude of immorality according to intention and action. For example, Aquinas says in the Summa Theologica II-II, q. 154, a. 12 "I answer that, In every genus, worst of all is the corruption of the principle on which the rest depend. Now the principles of reason are those things that are according to nature, because reason presupposes things as determined past nature, before disposing of other things according as it is fitting." He uses St. Augustine equally his source writing "Augustine says that 'of all these,' namely the sins belonging to lust, 'that which is against nature is the worst.'" Which St. Thomas clarifies ways that they are greater than sins confronting justice pertaining to the genus of lust, such every bit rape or incest, in his statement "Respond to Objection 3: The nature of the species is more than intimately united to each individual, than whatever other private is. Wherefore sins against the specific nature are more than grievous." Thus St. Thomas gives the society of magnitude of lustful acts as: "The most grievous is the sin of bestiality, because employ of the due species is not observed...(Then) the sin of sodomy, because use of the right sex is not observed...(And so) the sin of not observing the right way of copulation (or the unatural act or masturbation)... (And so) incest... is reverse to the natural respect which we owe persons related to the states... And then, it is a greater injustice to take intercourse with a woman who is subject field to some other's authority as regards the deed of generation, than as regards just her guardianship. Wherefore adultery is more than grievous than seduction. And both of these are aggravated by the use of violence." [6]

The Latin for extravagance (Latin: luxuria) was used by St. Jerome to translate a variety of biblical sins, including drunkenness and sexual excess.[7] Gregory the Great placed luxuria as one of the seven uppercase sins (it is ofttimes considered the to the lowest degree serious of the seven deadly sins), narrowing its scope to disordered desire,[eight] and it was in this sense that the Middle Ages generally took luxuria, (although the Erstwhile French cognate was adopted into English language as luxury without its sexual pregnant by the 14th century[ citation needed ]).

In Romanesque fine art, the personified Luxuria is mostly feminine,[9] frequently represented by a siren or a naked adult female with breasts beingness bitten by snakes. Prudentius in his Psychomachia or 'Battle of the Soul' had described[10]

Luxury, lavish of her ruined fame, Loose-haired, wild-eyed, her voice a dying fall, Lost in delight....

For Dante, Luxuria was both the beginning of the circles of incontinence (or cocky-indulgence) on the descent into hell, and the last of the cornices of Mount Purgatory, representing the excessive (matted) love of individuals;[11] while for Edmund Spenser, luxuria was synonymous with the power of want.[12]

For Gregory and subsequent Thomists, the 'daughters' (by-products) of Luxuria included mental blindness, self-love, haste, and excessive attachment to the present.[thirteen] Marianne Dashwood has been seen every bit embodying such characteristics for a afterward age – equally a girl of Luxuria.[14]

The Catholic Church defines lust as the idolatry of sexual pleasure, in all of its forms: contraception, masturbation, adultery, premarital relations, relations between persons of the same sex, etc, which destroys the human capacity of loving, that is, of the person to give herself to God and to others.

Protestantism [edit]

The evangelical Melvin Tinker states that: "The principle is articulate isn't it, 'You shall not commit adultery'? How does the Pharisee handle it according to the minimum requirement method? He says, 'Sex exterior marriage is OK for us because neither of u.s.a. are really married. I am non sleeping with another man's wife, so it isn't infidelity, she'southward my girlfriend'. Or information technology is as well not adultery because 'I have non had sexual practice with that adult female.' to quote President Clinton'southward plea in the Monica Lewinski [sic] saga. So he tin abuse his position as President by messing around with a girl who is inappreciably younger than his daughter, he tin engage in all kinds of sexual activities with her, simply because he technically doesn't have intercourse he can hold up his easily and say, 'I accept non had sexual practice with that woman.' That is a Pharisee speaking.

"But the maximum application method says, adultery doesn't merely happen when you have sexual intercourse, it happens in your heart. Notwithstanding, the mistranslation is unfortunate at this point. In the Greek it says, 'If anyone looks upon a woman in order to lust, has already committed adultery with her in his heart.' That is an important distinction. I need to point that out because sexual arousal, sexual involvement, sexual attraction are essential for the continuation of the homo species... Information technology is about looking in order to lust. The striptease prove, the muddied movie or video, the internet pornography. That is becoming a real problem... And if this is a difficulty for yous, and then do talk to someone about it in confidence. You see, it is the intending to look in society to have that arousal that Jesus has in his sights."[xv]

Islam [edit]

In Islam, lust is considered one of the archaic states of the self, chosen the nafs. Muslims are encouraged to overcome their baser instincts and intentional lascivious glances are forbidden. Lascivious thoughts are disliked, for they are the first step towards adultery, rape and other antisocial behaviors. Prophet Muhammad also stressed the magnitude of the "2nd glance", as while the first glance towards an attractive member of the opposite sex activity could be just adventitious or observatory, the 2nd glance could be that gate into lustful thinking.[16]

Indian religions [edit]

Hinduism [edit]

In the Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna, an Avatar of Vishnu, declared in affiliate sixteen, verse 21 that lust is 1 of the gates to Naraka or hell.

Arjuna said: O descendant of Vrsni, by what is one impelled to sinful acts, even unwillingly, every bit if engaged by strength? Then Krishna said: It is lust only, Arjuna, which is born of contact with the material mode of passion and later transformed into wrath, and which is the all-devouring sinful enemy of this world. As fire is covered past smoke, as a mirror is covered by grit, or as the embryo is covered by the womb, the living entity is similarly covered by different degrees of this lust. Thus the wise living entity'south pure consciousness becomes covered by his eternal enemy in the class of lust, which is never satisfied and which burns like burn. The senses, the listen and the intelligence are the sitting places of this lust. Through them animalism covers the real knowledge of the living entity and bewilders him. Therefore, O Arjuna, all-time of the Bharatas, in the very beginning curb this great symbol of sin—(lust) by regulating the senses, and slay this destroyer of knowledge and self-realization. The working senses are superior to dull matter; mind is college than the senses; intelligence is even so higher than the mind; and he [the soul] is even higher than the intelligence. Thus knowing oneself to be transcendental to the textile senses, mind and intelligence, O mighty-armed Arjuna, one should steady the mind by deliberate spiritual intelligence and thus—by spiritual forcefulness—conquer this insatiable enemy known equally lust. (Bhagavad-Gita, three.36–43)

In this ancient manuscript the idea backside the word 'Animalism' is best comprehended as the psychological forcefulness chosen 'Wanting'.

Buddhism [edit]

Animalism holds a critical position in the philosophical underpinnings of Buddhist reality. It is named in the 2nd of the Iv Noble Truths, which are that

  1. Suffering (dukkha) is inherent in all life.
  2. Suffering is caused past desire.
  3. There is a natural way to eliminate all suffering from one's life.
  4. The ending of desire eliminates all suffering from someones life.

Lust is the attachment to, identification with, and passionate desire for certain things in existence, all of which relate to the course, sensation, perception, mentality, and consciousness that certain combinations of these things engender within united states of america. Lust is thus the ultimate cause of general imperfection and the nigh firsthand root cause of a certain suffering.

The passionate desire for either non-beingness or for freedom from animalism is a common misunderstanding. For example, the headlong pursuit of lust (or other "deadly sin") in order to fulfill a desire for death is followed by a reincarnation accompanied by a self-fulfilling karma, resulting in an endless wheel of life, until the right mode to live, the correct worldview, is somehow discovered and practiced. Beholding an endless knot puts one, symbolically, in the position of the i with the right worldview, representing that person who attains liberty from lust.

In existence are four kinds of things that engender the clinging: rituals, worldviews, pleasures, and the self. The way to eliminate lust is to larn of its unintended furnishings and to pursue righteousness as concerns a worldview, intention, speech, beliefs, livelihood, endeavour, mindfulness, and concentration, in the place where lust formerly sat.

Sikhism [edit]

In Sikhism, animalism is counted amidst the v cardinal sins or sinful propensities, the others being wrath, ego, greed and attachment. Uncontrollable expression of sexual lust, as in rape or sexual addiction, is an evil.

Indian spirituality [edit]

Brahma Kumaris [edit]

According to Brahma Kumaris, a spiritual organisation which is based on Hindu philosophy, sexual lust is the greatest enemy to all mankind[17] and the gateway to hell.[eighteen]

For this reason followers do non consume onions, garlic, eggs, or non-vegetarian nutrient, every bit the "sulphur" in them tin excite sexual lust in the trunk, otherwise leap to celibacy.

The physical act of sexual activity is "impure", leading to body-consciousness and other crimes. This impurity "poisons" the torso and lein air.[19] [20] ads to many kinds of "diseases".

The Brahma Kumaris teaches that sexuality is foraging about in a dark sewer. Students at Spiritual University must conquer animalism, to prevent sin, and in order to be closer to god.[21]

The spiritual teacher Meher Baba described the differences betwixt lust and love:

In lust there is reliance upon the object of sense and consequent spiritual subordination of the soul to it, merely love puts the soul into direct and co-ordinate relation with the reality which is behind the form. Therefore, lust is experienced equally existence heavy and love is experienced as being light. In lust there is a narrowing down of life and in dearest there is an expansion in being...If you love the whole world you vicariously live in the whole world, but in lust there is an ebbing down of life and a general sense of hopeless dependence upon a grade which is regarded as another. Thus, in lust there is the accentuation of separateness and suffering, but in love there is the feeling of unity and joy....[22]

Paganism [edit]

Few ancient, pagan religions actually considered animalism to be a vice.[ citation needed ] The most famous instance of a widespread religious movement practicing lechery as a ritual is the Bacchanal of the Ancient Roman Bacchantes. However, this activity was soon outlawed by the Roman Senate in 186 BC in the decree Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus. The do of sacred prostitution, notwithstanding, connected to be an action practiced often by the Dionysians.

In civilization [edit]

Medieval prostitutes [edit]

Medieval prostitutes lived in officially sanctioned "red low-cal districts". In Ruth Mazo Karras' book Mutual Women, the writer discusses the meaning of prostitution and how people thought the proper use of prostitutes by single men helped incorporate male lust. Prostitution was thought of as having a beneficial effect by reducing the sexual frustration in the customs.[23]

In art [edit]

Literature [edit]

From Ovid to the works of les poètes maudits, characters take always been faced with scenes of lechery, and long since has animalism been a common motif in world literature. Many writers, such equally Georges Bataille, Casanova and Prosper Mérimée, have written works wherein scenes accept place at bordellos and other unseemly locales.

Baudelaire, author of Les fleurs du mal, had once remarked, in regard to the artist, that:

The more a man cultivates the arts, the less randy he becomes... But the brute is good at coupling, and copulation is the lyricism of the masses. To copulate is to enter into some other—and the artist never emerges from himself.

The most notable piece of work to touch upon the sin of animalism, and all of the Seven Mortiferous Sins, is Dante's Divine One-act. Dante'south criterion for lust was an "excessive dearest of others", insofar every bit an excessive dearest for human being would render one'due south love of God secondary. In the first canticle of the Divine Comedy—the Inferno—the lustful are punished by being continuously swept around in a whirlwind, which symbolizes their passions. The damned who are guilty of lust, like the 2 famous lovers, Paolo and Francesca, receive what they desired in their mortal lives, their passions never give them remainder for all eternity. In Purgatorio, of the selfsame piece of work, the penitents cull to walk through flames in order to purge themselves of their lustful inclinations.

In philosophy [edit]

The link between love and lust has e'er been a problematic question in philosophy.

Schopenhauer [edit]

Schopenhauer notes the misery which results from sexual relationships. Co-ordinate to him, this directly explains the sentiments of shame and sadness which tend to follow the act of sexual intercourse; for, he states, the merely power that reigns is the inextinguishable want to face, at any price, the blind love nowadays in homo existence without any consideration of the outcome. He estimates that a genius of his species is an industrial being who wants but to produce, and wants but to think. The theme of lust for Schopenhauer is thus to consider the horrors which will almost certainly follow the culmination of lust.

St Thomas Aquinas [edit]

St Thomas Aquinas defines the sin of lust in questions 153 and 154 of his Summa Theologica. Aquinas says the sin of animalism is of "voluptuous emotions", and makes the point that sexual pleasures, "unloosen the human spirit", and set bated correct reason (pg. 191). Aquinas restricts lust'due south discipline matter to physical desires specifically arising from sexual acts, just he does non assume all sex activity-acts are sinful. Sexual practice is not a sin in spousal relationship, because sexual activity is the only way for humans to reproduce. If sex is used naturally and the end purpose is reproduction there is no sin. Aquinas says, "if the end be skilful and if what is done is well-adapted to that, and then no sin is present" (pg. 193). However, sexual activity simply for the sake of pleasure is lustful, and therefore a sin. A human being who uses his body for lechery wrongs the Lord.

Sex may have the attributes of existence sinless; however, when a person seeks sex for pleasure, he or she is sinning with lust. Animalism is best defined by its specific attribute of rape, adultery, wet dreams, seduction, unnatural vice, and simple fornication.

Wet dreams: St Thomas Aquinas defined and discussed the topic of nocturnal emission, which occurs when ane dreams of physical pleasure. Aquinas argues those who say that wet dreams are a sin and comparable to the actual experience of sex are wrong. Aquinas believes that such an action is sinless, for a dream is not under a person's control or free judgment. When ane has a "nocturnal orgasm", it is not a sin, but information technology can lead to sins (pg. 227). Aquinas says that moisture dreams come up from a concrete cause of inappropriate pictures within your imagination, a psychological cause when thinking of sex while you autumn asleep and a demonical cause whereby demons act upon the sleeper's torso, "stirring the sleeper'southward imagination to bring about a orgasm" (pg. 225). In the end, though, dreaming of lustful acts is not sinful. The "mind's awareness is less hindered", as the sleeper lacks right reason; therefore, a person cannot be accountable for what they dream while sleeping (pg. 227).

Infidelity: I of the master forms of lust seen ofttimes during the Middle Ages was the sin of adultery. The sin of adultery occurs when a person is unfaithful to his or her spouse, hence "invading of a bed non one'southward own" (pg. 235). Adultery is a special kind of ugliness and many difficulties ascend from it. When a human being enters the bed of a wife information technology not but is a sin, but it "wrongs the offspring", because the adult female now calls into question the legitimacy of children (pg. 235). If a married woman has committed infidelity earlier, then, her husband will question if all his wife's children are his offspring.

Unproblematic fornication: Simple fornication is having sex with one's spouse for enjoyment rather than for bearing children. Fornication is besides sex between two unmarried people, which is besides a mortal sin. Aquinas says that "fornication is a mortiferous criminal offense" (pg. 213). Fornication is a mortal sin, only as Aquinas notes, "Pope Gregory treated sins of the mankind as less grievous than those of the spirit" (pg. 217). Fornication was a grave sin such as that against property. Fornication, nevertheless, is not as grave as a sin directly against God and human life; therefore, murder is much worse than fornication. Holding in this instance means that a daughter is the belongings of her begetter, and if 1 does wrong to her, 1 then does wrong to him; therefore seducing a virgin or seeking pleasure from an unmarried woman is an invasion of a father'south holding.

Seduction: Seduction is a type of lust, because seduction is a sexual practice act, which ravishes a virgin. Lust is a sin of sex, and "...a special quality of wrong that appears if a maid still under her father's intendance is debauched" (pg. 229). Seduction involves a discussion of belongings, as an single girl is property of her male parent. A virgin, even though gratis from the bond of marriage, is not free from the bond of her family. When a virgin is violated without a promise of engagement, she is prevented from having honorable marriage, which is shameful to herself and her family. A homo who performs sexual acts with a virgin must "endow her and take her to wife", and if the male parent, who is responsible for her, says no, then a man must pay a dowry to compensate for her loss of virginity and time to come chance of marriage. (pg. 229)

Unnatural vice: Unnatural vice is the worst kind of animalism because it is unnatural in human activity and purpose. Many varieties of unnatural vice exist; Aquinas provides several examples, including bestiality or intercourse with a "thing of another species" (for instance, an beast), incest, sodomy and "not observing the correct manner of copulation".[24]

In psychoanalysis and psychology [edit]

Lust, in the domain of psychoanalysis and psychology, is often treated equally a case of "heightened libido".

See besides [edit]

  • Adultery
  • Guiltlessness
  • Concupiscence
  • Desire
  • Fornication
  • Kam
  • Kama
  • Libido
  • Masturbation
  • Pornography
  • Sexual attraction
  • Sexual desire
  • Sexual fantasy
  • Taṇhā

References [edit]

  1. ^ Bava Bathra. pp. 16a.
  2. ^ "Wiktionary ἐπιθυμέω". Retrieved 26 Jan 2022.
  3. ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Lust". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  4. ^ Pope John Paul Two, Mutual Attraction Differs from Lust. L'Osservatore Romano, weekly edition in English, 22 September 1980, p. 11. Bachelor at http://www.ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2tb39.htm .
  5. ^ 'Catechism of the Cosmic Church, n° 2351 sq.
  6. ^ Aquinas, St Thomas. "Summa Theologiae". NewAdvent.org. Newadvent.org. Retrieved 1 September 2021.
  7. ^ Mark D. Hashemite kingdom of jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) p. 37
  8. ^ Mark D. Jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) pp. 39–40; Julien Théry, "Luxure cléricale, gouvernement de l'Église et royauté capétienne au temps de la 'Bible de saint Louis'", Revue Mabillon, 25, 2014, pp. 165–194
  9. ^ J. Jerman/A. Weir, Images of Lust (2013) p. 30
  10. ^ Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (1968) p. 48
  11. ^ Dante, Hell (1975) p. 101; Dante, Purgatory (1971) p. 67 and p. 202
  12. ^ C. J. Berry, The Idea of Luxury (1994) pp. 97–8
  13. ^ Mark D. Jordan, The Invention of Sodomy (1994) pp. 37–9
  14. ^ Robert Liddell, The Novels of Jane Austen (London 1963) p. 22
  15. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 30 Dec 2018. Retrieved 29 Dec 2018. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  16. ^ Jami' at-Tirmidhi,2701 "The Messenger of Allaah (Peace & Blessings of Allaah be upon Him) said: "O Ali, exercise not follow a glance with another, for you will be forgiven for the kickoff, merely non for the 2d.".
  17. ^ Through open up doors: a view of Asian cultures in Kenya. Cynthia Salvadori, Andrew Fedders, 1989
  18. ^ Exploring New Religions. p. 196, George D. Chryssides, 1999
  19. ^ Peace & purity: the story of the Brahma Kumaris : a spiritual revolution By Liz Hodgkinson
  20. ^ A history of celibacy, p. 172. Elizabeth Abbott, 2001
  21. ^ Peace & purity: the story of the Brahma Kumaris : a spiritual revolution Past Liz Hodgkinson
  22. ^ Baba, Meher (1967). Discourses. Volume I. San Francisco: Sufism Reoriented. pp. 159–160. ISBN 978-1880619094.
  23. ^ Karras, Ruth Mazo. Common Women: Prostitution and Sexuality in Medieval England. New York: Oxford Academy Press, 1996.
  24. ^ "St. Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica - Christian Classics Ethereal Library".

Further reading [edit]

  • Froböse, Gabriele, Rolf Froböse, and Michael Gross (translator). Lust and Love: Is information technology more than Chemical science? Royal Social club of Chemistry, 2006. ISBN 0-85404-867-7.

External links [edit]

  • The lexicon definition of lust at Wiktionary
  • "The Seven Deadly Sins: Lust" National Public Radio feature
  • "A New Look at Lust: The Secular View"
  • The Catholic Encyclopedia: Lust
  • Catechism of the Catholic Church: The Sixth Commandment
  • The Jewish Encyclopedia: Yeẓer ha-Ra
  • [one] Human Nature and Aquinas' Taxonomy of Sexual Sins, by Howard Kainz.

reavesextouralke.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lust

0 Response to "what is the bible remedy to get rid of evil force invadinf my house"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel